Effects of Xpert MTB/RIF and alternative diagnostics for tuberculosis in Tanzania
· Background:
WHO has endorsed several promising new diagnostic methods and algorithms for
tuberculosis. National tuberculosis programs must decide which methods to
implement and where to place them in the diagnostic process.
· Methods:
An integrated model was used to assess the effects of different diagnostic
algorithms involving Xpert MTB/RIF and LED fluorescence microscopy in Tanzania.
The model incorporated both operational and transmission components,
representing the epidemiological context of Tanzania. The analysis compared the
effects and cost-effectiveness of various diagnostic options.
· Findings:
- Three strategies were
identified as cost-effective in Tanzania.
- Full scale-up of Xpert
would have the greatest population-level impact, averting 346,000 DALYs at
an additional cost of $36.9 million over 10 years.
- The incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Xpert scale-up is $169 per DALY averted
(95% CrI 104–265), below Tanzania's willingness-to-pay threshold of $599.
- Same-day LED
fluorescence microscopy has an ICER of $45 (95% CrI 25–74), while standard
LED fluorescence microscopy has an ICER of $29 (95% CrI 6–59).
- Targeted use of Xpert
for presumptive tuberculosis cases with HIV infection, whether as an
initial test or follow-up to microscopy, is less cost-effective compared
to full rollout or same-day LED microscopy.
· Interpretation:
Full rollout of Xpert is a cost-effective strategy for tuberculosis diagnosis
in Tanzania and could significantly reduce the national tuberculosis burden.
However, substantial funding will be required to implement it in practice. This
approach can be adapted for other developing countries to support rational
health policy decisions.
Comments
Post a Comment